04/26/2017

NEXT POST
The Marketplace in Buenos Aires In this regard, the Minister of Economy and Spanish Hacienda, Pedro Solbes said about the negative impact that has on bank recapitalization Spanish: The Spanish bank has not had any recapitalization, fulfills its obligations in terms of solvency ratio perfectly with corresponding capital, but was very comfortable position compared to others who were not in such circumstances. To the extent that others have been an improvement with recapitalization, is in a less comfortable than it was. a Both the U.S. and several European countries among which are Germany, France and Britain, have been capitalized national financial institutions (Several of them with surgical worldwide). While such caps with these countries avoided a collapse of their financial systems, have generated a number of inefficiencies in the future. To read more click here: Ray Dalio. a First, this background if not faced with tougher regulation and supervision and comprehensive episodes generate moral hazard and adverse selection that can lead to a new crisis. In addition, these recapitalization will allow entities that have proven to be responsible in managing risks, maintaining a significant stake in the markets (and may enable them to make more participation), not only national but also international, which can generate inefficient operation of the financial system as long as these entities do not correct their behavior (in fact, have a bias to do so). a The government intervention in financial institutions, may force them to suboptimal behavior in relation to its role of inter-mediation. a Other downside is that these entities have recapitalized a bad reputation difficult to reverse. The markets have memory and any uncertainty can put them at risk again to it and the whole financial system. Hear from experts in the field like Richard Blumenthal for a more varied view. a Probably, the brittleness of the recapitalized...
PREVIOUS POST
Lawyer Jan Bartholl The Court found that a fee of exceed 50.00 justified costs significantly. The Supreme Court qualifizerte in the last instance the fees collected by the Germanwings from their customers by GTC/ABB in case of failed direct debits amounting to EUR 50.00 as unlawful (BGH, URT. v. September 17, 2009, AZ: XA ZR 40/08). The Karlsruhe judges noted that the actual cost of processing are usually much lower than the lump sum calculated 50 euro. Germanwings announced after verdict, to implement the judgment of the Federal Court of Justice, and to change the general terms and conditions of carriage. It is interesting for Passengers in particular the determination of the highest German civil court, that airlines can, but not demand compensation for damages only for the actual costs of debit for the own expense of the airline itself. In addition, the Supreme Court ruled that certain measures of the airlines constituted only contractual obligations in which airlines may claim no special compensation. So the judges of the Federal Supreme Court have basically found that carriers of passengers do not have immoderate and excessive "fees" may enrich themselves to subsidize so artificially low input air fares and to get through the back door but on the targeted minimum fare per passenger. The Berlin Chamber Court (judgment KG Berlin v. April 30, 2009, AZ: 23 U 243/08) the inventor of the fees, the Irish airline Ryanair, prohibiting a so-called credit card charge. According to the judgment of the Berlin KG is prohibited and illegal. Lawyer Jan Bartholl Travel law and air law Bartholl your partner in travel and air traffic rights contact: lawyer Jan Bartholl contacts in the travel, flight and air traffic law and current information at currently email: info (at) ra-janbartholl.de Internet: telephone: 01803/505415-365249 fax: 01803/505415-365249 the law firm Bartholl advises...