He questions, still, if the individual memory can be enough or if it needs the memory of the others as abutment and reinforcement, defending the idea of that is as members of groups that we remember. However, Halbwachs standes out the necessity of points of contact between the souvenirs, therefore we only can find support external, that is, in the story of the others, if I keep some thing of the shared experiences. For the sharing of the memories, beyond the convivncia with the group, it is necessary that these if relate and if they complement, that the basic one in the individual memory is, exactly, the social dimension: So that our memory if assists with the one of the others, it is not enough that they in them bring its deposition: it is necessary despite it has not ceased to agree to its memories and that she sufficiently has points of contact between one and the others so that the souvenir that remembers in them can be reconstructed on a common bedding. It is not enough to reconstitute to part for part the image of an event of the past to get a souvenir. It is necessary that this reconstruction if operates from data and common slight knowledge that if find in such a way in our spirit as in the one of the others, because they pass incessantly of these for that one and reciprocal, what she is only possible if they had made and they continue to be part of one same society. Thus we only can understand that a souvenir can at the same time recognized and be reconstructed.
(HALBWACHS, 1990, p.34). The author still presents two consideraes strengthening these relations between the rememorao and the social conviviality, which he himself points easily as accepted.
(HALBWACHS, 1990, p.34). The author still presents two consideraes strengthening these relations between the rememorao and the social conviviality, which he himself points easily as accepted.
Posted by: |