Economy Minister Martinez Step in to tell as they were eight years of military process of my country, now that the tragedy is consummated, which witnessed the destruction of our economy more vandalism in history. Corres weighted ask, what is the goal of all this destructive strategy? Of course, the motives are various, necessarily recurrent. The first and most elementary case of the TAS specialists that manage international banking and multinational companies is to maximize the so Prove possible in the short-term speculative investments, its maneuvers and tactics monopolistic extortion business. Read additional details here: Raymond Dalio. For something we have estimated at least 50,000 million dollars as investors swallows stolen our country during the years of de facto government, with Economy Minister Martinez de Hoz doctor in his destructive guideline. The second is to acquire through the impoverishment and weakening of our companies the best possible control of the national economic system. If we bear in mind the multitude of business and commercial brat occurred in the last 70 years, we have a rough idea of the true scope of the denationalization of enterprises and a large part of the movable assets of the nation, which occurred as the result of what we have to express . Third and last, because obtaining the goal excellent precedent paves the way for the political management and virtual occupation of our country to the strategists of "globalization l government." The critics say the nation state, to end the concept beyond the nation-state must carry out an action in a diversified way, inventing organizations with limited objectives with elected officials case by case, and continue eating it piece after piece, until the end to national sovereignty.
The Same He questions, still, if the individual memory can be enough or if it needs the memory of the others as abutment and reinforcement, defending the idea of that is as members of groups that we remember. However, Halbwachs standes out the necessity of points of contact between the souvenirs, therefore we only can find support external, that is, in the story of the others, if I keep some thing of the shared experiences. For the sharing of the memories, beyond the convivncia with the group, it is necessary that these if relate and if they complement, that the basic one in the individual memory is, exactly, the social dimension: So that our memory if assists with the one of the others, it is not enough that they in them bring its deposition: it is necessary despite it has not ceased to agree to its memories and that she sufficiently has points of contact between one and the others so that the souvenir that remembers in them can be reconstructed on a common bedding. It is not enough to reconstitute to part for part the image of an event of the past to get a souvenir. It is necessary that this reconstruction if operates from data and common slight knowledge that if find in such a way in our spirit as in the one of the others, because they pass incessantly of these for that one and reciprocal, what she is only possible if they had made and they continue to be part of one same society. Thus we only can understand that a souvenir can at the same time recognized and be reconstructed. (HALBWACHS, 1990, p.34). The author still presents two consideraes strengthening these relations between the rememorao and the social conviviality, which he himself points easily as accepted.

Recent Comments